Mercurial > vim-gutentags
comparison README.md @ 186:becdd3c867c7
fix typo
author | Florian Heiderich <florian@heiderich.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 29 May 2017 15:58:57 +0200 |
parents | bd641fccdae4 |
children | 39547ffc8867 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
184:3cd4597fb86b | 186:becdd3c867c7 |
---|---|
41 Usually, ctags can only append tags to an existing tag file, so Gutentags | 41 Usually, ctags can only append tags to an existing tag file, so Gutentags |
42 removes the tags for the current file first, to make sure the tag file is | 42 removes the tags for the current file first, to make sure the tag file is |
43 always consistent with the source code. | 43 always consistent with the source code. |
44 | 44 |
45 Also, Gutentags is clever enough to not stumble upon itself by triggering | 45 Also, Gutentags is clever enough to not stumble upon itself by triggering |
46 multiple ctags processes if you save files to fast, or your project is really | 46 multiple ctags processes if you save files too fast, or your project is really |
47 big. | 47 big. |
48 | 48 |
49 | 49 |
50 ## Why? | 50 ## Why? |
51 | 51 |